(Published in: New York Times, June 6, 2008)
South Carolina drivers will be the first in the nation to be offered license plates that carry the phrase âI Believeâ and a Christian cross over a stained-glass window under a law that took effect on Thursday.
Design for a proposed license plate that Florida rejected in April. The new South Carolina law is for a similar plate. [1]
Critics have threatened to fight the law in court, saying the license plate represents an illegal state endorsement of religion.
The bill authorizing the plate passed the State House and Senate unanimously on May 22. It became law without the signature of Gov. Mark Sanford, a Republican, under the South Carolina Constitution.
âWhile I do, in fact, âbelieve,â it is my personal view that the largest proclamation of oneâs faith ought to be in how one lives oneâs life,â Mr. Sanford wrote on Thursday in a letter to Glenn F. McConnell, president pro tem of the Senate and a fellow Republican.
The bill directs the Motor Vehicles Department to create the plate.
Mr. Sanford told the department to charge people just enough to reimburse the state for the cost to produce the plate, estimated at $4 to $6, and to not allow any organization to benefit from its sales.
The state offers 200 other specialty plates, supporting organizations like colleges, sororities, Boy Scouts and the Surfrider Foundation. The state charges up to $70 for those plates. The profit is sent to the sponsor.
A supporting organization normally pays the $4,000 start-up cost to create a plate. Because no organization will sponsor the âI Believeâ plate, at least 400 people have to buy one before the state will produce it.
Representatives of the American Civil Liberties Union and the American Jewish Congress said they were considering suing the state over the plate. Neither organization was aware of any previous state that has approved a similar plate. A proposal for an âI believeâ plate in Florida failed in April.
âThe whole issue here is that people are trying to get the state to endorse their religion, and thatâs wrong,â said Dr. T. Jeremey Gunn, director of the A.C.L.U. Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. âItâs almost as if thereâs insufficient support, and they have to go to the state to get it.â
Senator Lawrence K. Grooms, the co-sponsor of the bill, rejected that argument.
âI didnât see a constitutional problem with it,â said Mr. Grooms, a Republican who is chairman of the Senate Transportation Committee. âWe have other plates with religious symbols on them and phrases like âIn God We Trust.â Just because itâs a cross, some very closed-minded people donât believe it should be on a plate.â
Send